Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 0:25:02 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2014 0:25:02 GMT
KC trades
Jamal Charles (RB-KC) $ 3,350,000 (2015)
OAK Trades
1.15 (2014) 2015 1st rounder (KC) 2015 1st rounder (CIN) 2015 2nd rounder (KC) 2015 2nd rounder (HOU) 2015 3rd rounder (WASH)
I accept with post. Going to be going though a quick rebuild in KC because of the talented teams in division. I didn't have enough to compete against them after loosing lots of players to UFA. The picks will give me many options moving forward. Thanks oak , you aphave a fantastic team great job getting players and having ample amount of picks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 0:25:49 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2014 0:25:49 GMT
Oak declines... Sorry KC, but seeing the bears trade changes this trade drastically. You almost pulled this off flawlessly but you made the mistake of posting the bears trade before I accepted. With your 1st and 2nd now likely to be very high this is wayyy too much to give, especially to a division opponent. I hate to do this but I already felt I was overpaying.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 0:26:58 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2014 0:26:58 GMT
I like how when I back out of a trade cause of a bad pick it horrible but its ok to just back out because of a different trade at the same time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 0:43:10 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2014 0:43:10 GMT
It's not my proudest moment... but I felt a little deceived in the fact that KC gave every impression that he was trying to contend this year... argued that his picks would be late picks, then posts the McCoy deal on top of the Charles deal... not to mention Bears got a MUCH better deal, even though I negotiated for about 20 pages worth of PM's with the Chiefs and walked away at least once if not twice. This was a huge trade and affected me even more directly since Chiefs are in my division... All I did was put a better pick into our trade and you backed out, Browns. Still I debated doing this for almost 24 hours, didn't really want to, but in the end I felt it hurt my team too much in the long run.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 1:05:53 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2014 1:05:53 GMT
I understand pulling out if he made it seem like he was building a contending team. As for are trade I don't believe it was a better pick added IMO.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 1:12:17 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2014 1:12:17 GMT
Pulling out no matter the circumstances is breaking an unwritten rule. (But most people if not everyone has done it at least once.) Chiefs played the negotiation game very well. Unfortunately, he played it too good so he ends up getting the short end of the stick and is now stuck in the middle lol.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 1:36:24 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2014 1:36:24 GMT
LOL but it was Cleveland. It was my 2014 4th vs your 2014 4th. Not much difference... but I think it ended up being 4.1 vs 4.2 lol.
|
|
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 1:37:07 GMT
Post by Chiefs GM (Anthony) on Mar 11, 2014 1:37:07 GMT
This is unbelievable
|
|
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 1:37:49 GMT
Post by Chiefs GM (Anthony) on Mar 11, 2014 1:37:49 GMT
I'm sorry but this is absolutely disgusting. What I do with my team is my own decision. You accepted and told me to post
|
|
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 1:52:40 GMT
Post by Chiefs GM (Anthony) on Mar 11, 2014 1:52:40 GMT
So just because Oakland says , that I said I would be a "contending team" his words he's right?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 2:12:02 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2014 2:12:02 GMT
Sorry KC..you really got screwed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 2:30:42 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2014 2:30:42 GMT
Shout out to Oakland for really messing up a team's plan.
|
|
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 2:34:48 GMT
Post by Chiefs GM (Anthony) on Mar 11, 2014 2:34:48 GMT
Is that sarcasm ravens ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 3:13:52 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2014 3:13:52 GMT
How did I get such a better deal?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
KC/OAK
Mar 11, 2014 3:33:04 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2014 3:33:04 GMT
Do you really think 1.17, 1.23, chi 1st and chi 2nd is the same value as 1.15, Cin 1st, KC 1st, KC 2nd, HOU 2nd, and WAS 3rd? Or do you think Charles is worth more than McCoy?
|
|