WAS/NE

[Deleted]

I got 4 1sts for AJ green... You're telling me you only had to give up 1 for Foster?

And to bengals, the veto should come when he's giving up a lot for nothing. Weather he prefers to doesn't even matter unless you suspect collusion

[Deleted]

And how the hell are tannehil, bush and a 1st even close to being compared to Hoyer(backup), Redman(might as well be a backup) and a first....

[Deleted]

No, actually I didn't miss out badly. No way is Foster worth Tannehill, let alone my 1.07, and Bush on top of that. What seem to miss is that the #3 QB Arizona and the #3-#4 HB in Pitt are not even close to Tannehill/Bush. You doing this deal is you getting robbed.

[Deleted]

Touchy touchy are we skins?

[Bengals GM (Darryl)]

Apr 12, 2013 22:04:11 GMT @sanjulz said:

I got 4 1sts for AJ green... You're telling me you only had to give up 1 for Foster?

And to bengals, the veto should come when he's giving up a lot for nothing. Weather he prefers to doesn't even matter unless you suspect collusion

ummmmm, am I suppose to make sense of this comment???...lol

[Deleted]

So Foster is now not even worth Tannehill--bloody hell, I did well then. For a slightly above average RB I get a couple of fair players and a 1st round draft pick

[Deleted]

Apr 12, 2013 23:37:07 GMT @crestmount said:

So Foster is now not even worth Tannehill--bloody hell, I did well then. For a slightly above average RB I get a couple of fair players and a 1st round draft pick

In what world are Hoyer and Redman "fair players"?

[Deleted]

the same world where Tanehill is worth more than Foster

[Deleted]

Right because a starting rookie QB on a 4 yr contract 1/4 the price of Fosters isn't worth Foster on a 3 yr deal? You crazy man. I mean, come on, Redman and Hoyer are both no higher than #3 on their respective teams depth chart.

[Deleted]

What I was saying it Tannehill AND BUSH plus a 1.07 is not worth Arian Foster alone... But he is certainly worth a LOT more than what you got for him. You trade him for a lot of picks or players with good contracts who actually have a chance to start.

[Bengals GM (Darryl)]

Personally, I'd rather have a starting QB and a serviceable RB crew...won't get far without a starting QB

[Deleted]

yea, IM not sure how this trade got approved and then everyone is complaining about Dan getting another lopsided trade passed. I think the Bengals got more for Spiller than Skins for Foster. After seeing past trades of #1 players at their positions go for multiple 1sts AND good players, its disappointing to see this approved. Oh well. I didnt make an offer for Foster in offseason as last year I made an offer and got told he wasnt going to be traded. :/ Eh, congrats Dan and I hope the Skins get the player they want in draft and hit a homerun with it or else this could be a really bad trade later.

[Deleted]

Washington probably is Dan.

[Deleted]

Apr 13, 2013 0:51:31 GMT Bengals GM (Darryl) said:

Personally, I'd rather have a starting QB and a serviceable RB crew...won't get far without a starting QB

And that is exactly what I got with pick 1.11

[Deleted]

Apr 13, 2013 5:20:18 GMT @tejan0 said:

Eh, congrats Dan and I hope the Skins get the player they want in draft and hit a homerun with it or else this could be a really bad trade later.

Does getting Flacco for the next 4yrs qualify as close to a homerun with pick 1.11