Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2012 17:09:46 GMT
Washington Redskins tender JoLonn Dunbar (NO-LB) $800,000 -- 1st Round Pick.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2012 19:45:13 GMT
Redskins offer JoLonn Dunbar a 2 year extension worth $1,000,000 a year.
Dunbar preformed well last year, but signed with St. Louis and is now playing on a weaker team.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2012 21:59:43 GMT
Veto (0-1)
As I have stated in other lb's tenders, a starting lb is good for upwards of 70 tackles and worth more than 1 mil.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2012 1:39:27 GMT
New team and the uncertainty that comes with that. He may get get a good role but for two years I am okay at 1M, approve (1-1)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2012 3:11:25 GMT
I'm on board with the bears here. What does weaker team have to do with IDP? Weaker teams defense is on the field more often. That's a good thing.
Veto (1-2)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2012 12:37:41 GMT
Approve (2-2). Agree with Seahawks, plus, if the market thought he was going to be a world-beater, there would have been RFA bids.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2012 15:44:31 GMT
Approve (2-2). Agree with Seahawks, plus, if the market thought he was going to be a world-beater, there would have been RFA bids. Not really. The tender was too high. Nobody is giving up a first for him. 2nd Round tender would have been more realistic and drawn some interest. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2012 17:12:13 GMT
Approve (2-2). Agree with Seahawks, plus, if the market thought he was going to be a world-beater, there would have been RFA bids. Not really. The tender was too high. Nobody is giving up a first for him. 2nd Round tender would have been more realistic and drawn some interest. IMHO, the two are linked. A valuable player is one the market would pay higher and/or give up additional value for. A not-valuable player would not be paid as high or merit high value in a trade. So, for me, if no one is willing to give up a first, then he is not worth a first. If he is not worth a first, then he need not be paid like someone who is worth a first. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2012 17:33:08 GMT
No one is saying he isn't worth a 1st. They are saying he isn't worth the first and a big contract. A good player doesn't have to be overpaid in order to be a good player. As a good player he is worth more than 1 mil
|
|
|
|
Post by Bengals GM (Darryl) on May 7, 2012 17:41:13 GMT
A new team doesn't necessarily equate to less production or playing time. I agree with Bears and Texans. I'm sure there are equitable comparisons in pay/production for the quality of this LB.
Veto (2-3)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2012 20:18:38 GMT
Redskins submit a new offer of $1,500,000 a year for 2 years.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2012 1:51:33 GMT
Approve (1-0)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2012 2:18:11 GMT
Much better. Approve (2-0)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2012 3:02:37 GMT
Yup. Approve (3-0)
|
|
|
|
Post by Bengals GM (Darryl) on May 9, 2012 3:11:35 GMT
won by Redskins JoLonn Dunbar (LB-STL) $1,500,000 (2013)
|
|
