|
|
Post by Chiefs GM (Anthony) on Mar 30, 2020 20:40:55 GMT
KC Trades
Dulin, Ashton IND WR $1,000,000 2021 RFA
Meyers, Jakobi NEP WR $1,000,000 2021 RFA
1.28
Next Year 3rd(KC)
Next Year 4th(PHI)
WAS Trades
Jones, Aaron GBP RB $13,800,000 2023
Proposed on MFL
Jones was a guy I went after in RFA so really happy to get him in this trade. The 2M Im sending helps with Jones well earned salary
Thanks WAS
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2020 20:43:55 GMT
Redskins accept.
Jones had a great year there is no arguing that, however, I think he regresses. The Packers also like to involve Williams in the offense and I think that continues to happen in 2020. Meyers is a guy I like in NE this season and I believe Sony bounces back to give me a solid #1 RB.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nate (Lions GM) on Mar 30, 2020 21:24:33 GMT
Veto
Jones is a top 5 RB, Not enough real value added to that first. Late picks in a year are minimal value when acquiring an elite player.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2020 0:34:49 GMT
Veto (0-2)
I think this trade is closer than what's being portrayed on the chat. 13m is a lot of cap locked up, and this is really the peak for Aaron Jones. I don't think his value ever gets much higher and RBs are so volatile in this league.
With that being said, I think this sets a very bad precedent for what was one of the best players in the league last year. 1.28 is usually a solid player but is rarely a gamechanger. I think if the 2021 picks were higher, or if the players being returned were a bit higher, I could see this trade being passed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bengals GM (Darryl) on Mar 31, 2020 0:56:23 GMT
Interesting...
Although I'm not one for commenting so much on trades anymore, I will add a brief one here. First, I agree with the above comments. However, I believe taking on $11 Mil in cap should not only be taken into consideration with the other pieces, but also, am considering the fact that the reasons for the trade are sufficiently stated and supported according to individual team resources.
Here, it appears both teams are taking a gamble (as most trades are), and the direction of their repective organisations are clear.
I would only add, that I'll approve, conditioned on the next year picks be specifically clarified.
Approve (1-2)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2020 2:56:36 GMT
I agree with Bengals on this trade, they cap being created for Redskins is enough compensation that when included with other pieces of the trade make this a fair trade. A big thing that I take in to consideration is also the reason stated. Every team has their own strategy to guide their team, and if you can at least articulate it helps me to determine if it a trade that I would never do could at least make sense for you. Both teams explained what they are trying to do and how it helps.
Approve 2-2
|
|
|
|
Post by Bills GM (Greg) on Mar 31, 2020 3:56:22 GMT
Veto (2-3) I am going to veto this trade. I hope that the Redskins & Chiefs find a way to make it more fair for the Redskins. I believe that this trade was brought about when the new Redskins GM found himself in salary cap hell after being forced to match the Chiefs high bid in RFA or accept the Pick 1.28 in compensation. He does get a little more than that here, but but not enough in my opinion for a top five RB. I don't believe that the value is as far off as some of the comments above, in the best interest of the league, the TAB has an obligation to make sure that new GMs who are just learning the players values in this league get fair value for their stars.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bills GM (Greg) on Mar 31, 2020 6:47:56 GMT
TRADE VETOED (2-3)
|
|
