Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2012 23:46:25 GMT
Ravens trade-
Ray Rice - $11,344,000 (2012) - Franchise Tag (F1)
49ers trade-
Antonio Smith (HOU) -- $4,600,000 (2013)
Mike Williams (TB) -- $405,000 (2013)
2012 Titans 1st
2014 Giants 4th
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 12:30:13 GMT
I agree with bears. It's a bad trade for ravens but he agreed to it. It's not a bad enough trade that it upsets balance of the league. It's a bad trade but that shouldn't make it vetoable. Just because ravens changed his mind after reading what TAB had to say about it shouldn't get him out of it either. It's his team, not TABs. Maybe we need to hurry up and get the probation period for new owners.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 12:43:51 GMT
It's fine, I just rushed into things, at least I got a couple of picks out of it
|
|
|
|
Post by Bengals GM (Darryl) on Apr 13, 2012 16:40:09 GMT
Personally I feel this trade would have upset the balance...
Sometimes, upsetting the balance involves much more than the mere "losing" or "winning" end of a trade. The GM may suffer the consequences should he stay and play. However the organization itself , should a GM choose to leave, would be left raped without main pieces to move or to build around in efforts to rebuild.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 16:49:44 GMT
Hmm... It really is interesting to see the value different people put on trades haha. I thought a 1st and a young wr on a cheap contract was decent value for a franchise tagged hb.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 16:54:31 GMT
Had it been approved I would have still stayed and dealt with my decision.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 17:07:33 GMT
If a trade is going to be vetoed shouldn't it be a little more of a unanimous decision? I know we've done this before and I'm not going to get fired up about this but seems like there are more people who think this trade is acceptable than don't. Ravens lost this trade but calling it a "rape" is pretty extreme. This trade does not flip a organization upside down. If ray rice was still under a descent contract then maybe it would of deserved some attention but ray rice at franchise cost I just don't see why this gets vetoed. All trades shouldn't have to be equal. Some winners and some losers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 17:12:53 GMT
And some look like losers for one side but later they are the winners. I agree with you Titans about the out come of the trade, but the first to 3 votes is also a fair way of deciding IMO. Just wish the decisions weren't based on an owners thoughts after he had read other owners opinions of the trade.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 18:48:10 GMT
If the commish or majority believe that the trade should go through, I wouldn't complain. I just don't want to get a free pass just because I'm new to dynasty and I changed my mind afterwards.
|
|
|
|
Post by reyalmanza on Apr 13, 2012 18:50:06 GMT
I agree the deal was vetoed because the owner realized he made a mistake. Not because the deal itself i think the deal is pretty fair tbh, just look at what bears is saying.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 20:28:52 GMT
I agree that we need to get that probation period up and running. There have been wayyy to many instances of new owners making bad trades. However I don't see this trade as absolutely terrible. 49ers win in my opinion, but its not complete trade rape. Rice is going to cost a whole lot of money to continue to franchise and Williams could turn himself around(although I doubt it). He should still be a WR3 on a cheap contract regardless. I think if the RD 1 pick would have been slightly higher or another pick was thrown in this would have been a fair trade. Just kind of depends on your opinion of mike williams as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 20:39:36 GMT
Can TAB be over ruled if enough people think the trade was fair enough. Or is TAB be all end all?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 20:40:51 GMT
Can TAB be over ruled if enough people think the trade was fair enough. Or is TAB be all end all? Really? Is this a serious question? Its TAB Only. |
|
|
|
Post by reyalmanza on Apr 13, 2012 20:47:12 GMT
did Tab vote on the trade itself? or they vote because the owner wanted out.... thats 2 different parts, because the trade was pretty fair itself
|
|
|
|
Post by Patriots GM (Daniel) on Apr 13, 2012 20:49:18 GMT
The trade may have been fair in your eyes, but in 4 of the TABs eyes it wasnt
|
|
