Issue of Signing RFA's

[Deleted]

ALL should have been RFA per rules:
Pullard, Hayes LAC LB 133.00 9 $800,000 2017
Kazee, Damontae ATL S (R) 47.00 5 $1,000,000 2017
Daniels, Darrell IND TE 9.60 11 $500,000 2017
Johnson, Jaleel MIN DT (R) 1.00 9 $230,000 2017 new contract will be RFA in 2019
Pierre, Olsen ARI DT 86.50 8 $305,000 2017

[Deleted]

Haven't gone through half the league yet. It's not a handful of players.

[Bengals GM (Darryl)]

Jul 31, 2018 0:08:36 GMT @redzone said:

ALL should have been RFA per rules:
Pullard, Hayes LAC LB 133.00 9 $800,000 2017
Kazee, Damontae ATL S (R) 47.00 5 $1,000,000 2017
Daniels, Darrell IND TE 9.60 11 $500,000 2017
Johnson, Jaleel MIN DT (R) 1.00 9 $230,000 2017 new contract will be RFA in 2019
Pierre, Olsen ARI DT 86.50 8 $305,000 2017

I am only interested in qualifying FA's signed last year and listed here: dynastynflgm.proboards.com/thread/10754/2018-free-agents-rfas

[Deleted]

Players listed have under 3 years played so under the rule should have actually been RFA not UFA.